Identify, evaluate, and control process hazards with expert risk assessments, ensuring safe, reliable, and compliant industrial operations.
Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) is a systematic method used to measure risk using numerical data. It estimates the probability and impact of potential events through mathematical and statistical analysis. By expressing risks in numbers, QRA enables organizations to make objective, data-driven decisions for safety and performance improvement.
While qualitative risk assessment categorizes risks as high, medium, or low based on judgment, QRA uses data and models to assign numerical values to likelihood and consequence. Quantification removes subjectivity, offering more precise insights for planning and control.
QRA is vital when risks have significant safety, financial, or environmental implications. It is commonly applied in industries such as oil and gas, manufacturing, construction, energy, and infrastructure, where accurate risk evaluation is critical for compliance and operational continuity.
Identify potential hazards and define credible scenarios that could lead to loss events.
Use data, historical records, and models to estimate how often each scenario might occur.
Quantify potential effects on people, assets, and the environment in measurable terms.
Combine probability and consequence to calculate overall risk using formulas and modeling tools. The results help prioritize mitigation actions based on measurable risk levels.
Used to assess and manage risks related to equipment failure, chemical releases, and operational hazards.
Helps evaluate potential cost overruns, schedule delays, and investment risks to improve project reliability.
Quantifies the likelihood and financial impact of data breaches, system failures, and security incidents.
Ensure data accuracy and validate all assumptions to maintain reliability and consistency in results.
Incorporate uncertainty and perform sensitivity analysis to identify which factors most influence outcomes.
Translate analytical results into clear, actionable risk control strategies to guide decision-making and compliance.
Engage multidisciplinary teams throughout the process. Present results clearly, linking risk metrics with business objectives and safety goals for effective communication.
+91 99994 02106
Identify, evaluate, and control process hazards with expert risk assessments ensuring safe, reliable, and compliant industrial operations.
Ensures robust Process Safety Management systems to prevent major industrial incidents.
Independent evaluation of safety systems to ensure compliance and operational integrity.
Assesses Health, Safety & Environment controls at every project stage for safer execution.
Visual risk assessment method that maps hazards, causes, consequences, and controls.
Supports compliance with Control of Major Accident Hazards regulations for high-risk sites.
Identifies combustible dust hazards and mitigates explosion risks in work environments.
Analyzes escape routes and rescue strategies to ensure safe evacuation during emergencies.
Evaluates whether critical systems can withstand emergency conditions and remain functional.
Maps fire and gas detector coverage to optimize safety system placement and performance.
Comprehensive site audit to identify safety gaps and enhance operational performance.
Assesses potential fire and explosion scenarios to strengthen prevention and response plans.
Systematically evaluates failures and their impacts to improve reliability and safety.
Identifies workplace hazards and evaluates risks to establish effective control measures.
A data-driven process that measures risk by calculating the probability and impact of potential events.
QRA uses numerical data and models, while qualitative methods rely on descriptive ratings.
Hazard identification, frequency estimation, consequence analysis, risk calculation, and interpretation.
Monte Carlo simulation, Expected Monetary Value (EMV), Annualized Loss Expectancy (ALE), and decision trees.
When accurate, measurable, and objective risk evaluation is required for safety-critical or high-value operations.
By comparing quantified risk levels against acceptable thresholds to guide mitigation and decision-making.
When accurate, measurable, and objective risk evaluation is required for safety-critical or high-value operations.