External safety audits play a pivotal role in ensuring that organisations’ safety management systems are robust, compliant, and continually improving. This page explores what external safety audits are, their scope, how to plan and conduct them, how to report and follow up findings, the benefits and challenges, how to integrate them into your broader safety framework, and real‐world considerations across industries.
An external safety audit is a systematic, independent evaluation of an organisation’s safety management system (SMS) and practices, conducted by parties external to the organisation (for example, consultants, regulatory bodies or certification bodies).
Organisations carry out external safety audits to obtain an objective appraisal of safety performance, verify compliance with regulatory or industry standards, uncover latent hazards, benchmark against best practice and drive continual improvement.
Internal audits are conducted by the organisation’s own resources and focus on internal monitoring and improvement, whereas external audits bring independent oversight, often have greater credibility, and may be required by regulators or certification schemes.
An external safety audit typically reviews core SMS elements such as safety policy and leadership commitment, risk assessment and hazard identification, training and competence of personnel, emergency preparedness and response, change management, incident investigation and corrective action.
Auditors will assess compliance with applicable laws and regulations (local and national), industry‐specific standards, and certification frameworks such as ISO 45001 for occupational health & safety management systems.
External audits may take several forms: third-party/independent audits (by certification bodies or consultants), regulatory audits (by government or oversight agencies), and surprise or unannounced audits to test live preparedness and compliance.
Choosing the right audit provider involves assessing their industry experience, accreditation or certification credentials, independence (no conflicts of interest), methodology, and ability to deliver actionable findings.
Before the external audit, the organisation should compile relevant documentation (policies, procedures, records), perform a self-audit or internal review, define roles and responsibilities for audit liaison, and ensure staff awareness.
Planning logistical details such as schedule of site visits, sequences of interviews with personnel, observational activities on the shop floor, and coordination of audit team access is essential to ensure a smooth and effective audit.
Audit methodology leverages tools such as structured checklists aligned to standards, interviews with employees, inspections of equipment and work areas, and review of documents and records.
Auditors gather evidence by sampling records and operations, conducting observations of actual practice, interviewing workers and supervisors, and verifying that documented procedures match actual behaviour.
The audit team must behave with professionalism, impartiality and transparency, interacting respectfully with personnel, avoiding criticism of individuals, maintaining confidentiality, and ensuring findings are fact-based and objective.
The audit report should clearly present observations (areas of strength and weakness), non-conformities (failure to meet requirements) and opportunities for improvement, along with evidence and references.
Following the report, the organisation should prioritise actions based on risk, severity and resources, define corrective (addressing current issues) and preventive (avoiding future recurrence) measures.
Monitoring implementation of actions, verifying their effectiveness, documenting closure of findings and feeding into the continual improvement cycle ensures that the audit delivers lasting value rather than remaining a report on a shelf.
External audits bring objectivity and independence, enhancing credibility with regulators, clients and stakeholders; they help assure compliance, highlight hidden risks, and support continuous improvement of safety culture.
Challenges include insufficient preparation, lack of documentation, low personnel engagement, treating the audit as a “tick-box” exercise rather than learning opportunity, and failing to follow up effectively on findings.
Best practices include being transparent with auditors, embracing their findings as improvement opportunities, integrating them into the safety management process, scheduling regular audits, and ensuring management follow-through.
Audit results should feed into the organisation’s risk management processes and continual improvement loop: findings inform risk registers, corrective/preventive plans, safety objectives and management review.
To leverage audits fully, organisations should align external safety audits with certification frameworks such as ISO 45001 to ensure that audits support certifications and systematic safety management.
A coordinated approach ensures the internal and external audits complement each other, avoid duplication, and that audit cycles are scheduled ahead of time (e.g., annual or multi-year). Integrated programmes reduce burden and enhance coherence.
In industries such as oil & gas, external safety audits focus heavily on process safety management, fire/explosion hazards, emergency response and specific regulatory rules.
Some sectors employ surprise external safety audits or pre-commissioning audits (before a facility goes into operation) to test readiness and compliance under real conditions, rather than merely reviewing documentation.
Organizations that treat external audits as learning opportunities, integrate findings into their safety management, and demonstrate visible management commitment tend to achieve better safety performance and internal buy-in, rather than merely ticking compliance boxes.
Identify, evaluate, and control process hazards with expert risk assessments, ensuring safe, reliable, and compliant industrial operations.
Ensures robust Process Safety Management systems to prevent major industrial incidents.
Uses data-driven analysis to measure and minimize potential risks in your facility.
Assesses Health, Safety & Environment controls at every project stage for safer execution.
Visual risk assessment method that maps hazards, causes, consequences, and controls.
Supports compliance with Control of Major Accident Hazards regulations for high-risk sites.
Identifies combustible dust hazards and mitigates explosion risks in work environments.
Analyzes escape routes and rescue strategies to ensure safe evacuation during emergencies.
Evaluates whether critical systems can withstand emergency conditions and remain functional.
Maps fire and gas detector coverage to optimize safety system placement and performance.
Comprehensive site audit to identify safety gaps and enhance operational performance.
Assesses potential fire and explosion scenarios to strengthen prevention and response plans.
Systematically evaluates failures and their impacts to improve reliability and safety.
Identifies workplace hazards and evaluates risks to establish effective control measures.
An external safety audit provides an independent assessment of an organisation’s safety management system (SMS) to verify compliance, identify risks, and promote continual improvement.
External safety audits are typically performed by independent consultants, certification bodies (e.g., ISO auditors), or regulatory authorities with relevant expertise and accreditation.
The frequency depends on regulatory requirements, certification cycles (e.g., annual ISO 45001 audits), and the organisation’s risk profile—but most conduct them annually or every two to three years.
Internal audits are carried out by in-house teams for self-assessment and improvement, while external audits are performed by independent parties for unbiased evaluation and greater credibility.
Common frameworks include ISO 45001 (Occupational Health and Safety), OHSAS 18001 (legacy), or industry-specific regulations such as OSHA, COMAH, or API standards.
A Fire Audit is often a compliance inspection, while a Fire Adequacy Study is a detailed technical evaluation that measures performance and system sufficiency against fire-risk scenarios.
Preparation includes reviewing safety documentation, completing a self-audit, briefing employees, ensuring records are up to date, and clarifying audit logistics and responsibilities
Auditors review documents, inspect facilities, interview staff, and observe practices to verify compliance with safety standards and identify improvement opportunities.
Findings may include non-conformities (failures to meet requirements), observations, and opportunities for improvement, all documented in the final audit report.
They should analyse root causes, prioritise corrective and preventive actions based on risk, and track implementation until all issues are verified as closed.
Benefits include improved compliance, enhanced safety performance, objective insights, greater stakeholder confidence, and stronger safety culture.