Project HSE Review (PHSER) – A Complete Guide

A concise guide to understanding PHSER—its purpose, process, benefits, and how it ensures safe, compliant, and sustainable project execution.

What is a Project HSE Review (PHSER)?

Definition and scope

A PHSER is a structured review of health, safety, and environmental performance at key project stages. It verifies that HSE risks are identified, managed, and aligned with corporate and regulatory standards.

Why PHSER is important in the project lifecycle

PHSER assures that HSE controls are in place before moving to the next project phase, reducing risks, costs, and delays while supporting decision gates and compliance.

Key differences from other HSE audits and reviews

Unlike detailed HAZOP or operational audits, PHSER focuses on high-level assurance—confirming that risk management systems, not just hazards, are ready at each stage.

Objectives and Benefits of PHSER

Core objectives across project stages

  • Identify and manage major HSE risks.

  • Verify readiness before project phase transitions.

  • Provide independent HSE assurance to management.

Benefits for safety, environment & compliance

  • Strengthens design and operational safety.

  • Embeds environmental protection early.

  • Avoids rework, incidents, and penalties.

Value to stakeholders

  • Owners: Independent confirmation of HSE compliance.

  • Contractors: Clarity on HSE expectations.

  • Regulators: Evidence of proactive risk management.

PHSER Framework & Methodology

Lifecycle stages (Concept → Abandonment)

Typical PHSERs occur during:

  1. Concept / FEED

  2. Detailed Design

  3. Construction

  4. Commissioning / Operation

  5. Decommissioning

Methodology and workshop format

A cross-discipline team reviews HSE inputs, interviews stakeholders, and assesses project readiness through structured workshops led by an independent chair.

Independent review & governance

An external team ensures objectivity, consistent standards, and proper governance for findings, approvals, and closures.

Inputs, Deliverables and Tracks

Essential input documents

  • HAZID, HAZOP, EIA, QRA

  • Project HSE Plan and MOC records

  • Fire, safety, and integrity studies

Deliverables

  • PHSER report with findings

  • Action-tracking register

  • Recommendation and closure list

Follow-up and integration

All recommendations feed into the Project HSE Plan and must be tracked to closure before phase progression.

Implementation Across Project Phases

Concept / FEED phase

Focus: identify key hazards, technology risks, and regulatory gaps. Ensure HSE integration in early project design.

Detailed Engineering & Construction phase

Focus: confirm design HSE studies are complete and construction controls reflect design intent.

Commissioning, Operation & Decommissioning

Focus: verify operational readiness, training, emergency plans, and safe handover or dismantling procedures.

Common Challenges & Pitfalls

Late scheduling

Conducting PHSER too late leads to costly rework and missed safety opportunities.

Incomplete documentation or engagement

Missing studies or absent key personnel reduce review quality and credibility.

Weak action tracking

Unclosed recommendations erode assurance and leave risks unresolved.

Best Practices for Effective PHSER

Early integration

Plan PHSER within the HSE execution strategy from project start.

Multi-discipline, independent team

Use diverse experts and an unbiased chair to ensure balanced, comprehensive review outcomes.

Strong closure and learning loop

Track all actions, share lessons learned, and embed continuous improvement in future reviews.

Conclusion – Leveraging PHSER for Project Success

Summary

PHSER provides structured HSE assurance throughout the project lifecycle—verifying that risks are managed and compliance maintained.

Next steps

Schedule reviews early, prepare inputs, involve the right experts, and ensure robust action tracking.

Sustainable, safe, compliant delivery

With proper implementation, PHSER drives safer projects, regulatory compliance, and lasting environmental stewardship.

What we offer

Our Services

Identify, evaluate, and control process hazards with expert risk assessments, ensuring safe, reliable, and compliant industrial operations.

Ensures robust Process Safety Management systems to prevent major industrial incidents.

Independent evaluation of safety systems to ensure compliance and operational integrity.

Bow-Tie Analysis

Visual risk assessment method that maps hazards, causes, consequences, and controls.

Uses data-driven analysis to measure and minimize potential risks in your facility.

COMAH

Supports compliance with Control of Major Accident Hazards regulations for high-risk sites.

Identifies combustible dust hazards and mitigates explosion risks in work environments.

Analyzes escape routes and rescue strategies to ensure safe evacuation during emergencies.

Emergency Systems Survivability Analysis (ESSA)

Evaluates whether critical systems can withstand emergency conditions and remain functional.

Maps fire and gas detector coverage to optimize safety system placement and performance.

Comprehensive site audit to identify safety gaps and enhance operational performance.

Fire & Explosion Risk Assessment (FERA)

Assesses potential fire and explosion scenarios to strengthen prevention and response plans.

Systematically evaluates failures and their impacts to improve reliability and safety.

Identifies workplace hazards and evaluates risks to establish effective control measures.

How it works

Industry Consultation

Project Scoping & Industry Brief

Service Selection

Site Visit & Inspection

Audit & Analysis

Report Submission & Discussion

Safety Consultant Company in India
AURA is a 100% Indian company, founded with a dream to create an aura of safety by delivering practical and cost-effective engineering solutions.

Frequently Ask Question

A PHSER ensures that health, safety, and environmental (HSE) risks are identified, assessed, and effectively managed at each stage of a project. It provides independent assurance that projects are ready to move to the next phase safely and in compliance with standards.

While HAZOPs and QRAs focus on detailed technical hazards and risk analysis, a PHSER provides a higher-level assurance. It reviews whether the overall HSE management systems, governance, and readiness criteria are in place before project progression.

PHSERs are typically conducted at key project milestones such as Concept/FEED, Detailed Design, Construction, Commissioning/Operation, and Decommissioning. Each review verifies that HSE controls and plans are adequate for the upcoming phase.

A PHSER is led by an independent chair and involves a multi-disciplinary team of internal and external HSE experts, engineers, and project representatives. The independent review ensures objectivity and consistent governance.

 Key outputs include a comprehensive PHSER report, an action-tracking register, and a recommendation closure list. These deliverables form the basis for follow-up and continuous improvement throughout the project lifecycle.

Typical challenges include late scheduling, incomplete documentation, lack of key stakeholder participation, and weak follow-up on recommendations—all of which can reduce the review’s effectiveness and delay project progress.

Success depends on early integration of PHSER in project planning, involvement of a skilled and independent team, thorough documentation, and strong action tracking and closure. Embedding lessons learned into future projects enhances long-term safety and compliance

Get free a quote